Did you know that the average student studying a foreign language to spend more time on dwellings own grammatical rules on seaking really just the language? This may be one disadvantage of their language proficiency.
The problem: It’s not just about how invalid language courses, some of these elements such as translation and grammar exercises damaging.
Before going into detail, please remember: how did you go? All alone and I think you further agree that nowhere in the world for a pediatrician or a teacher, special instructions and walking exercises for babies and toddlers would be (unless they are disabled). Similarly, we all know that children learn their native language automatically just by listening, and gradually to communicate with people who are more advanced than them. White For six years, one child developed normally, about 100,000 words in their native language if you can count on all forms of text, eg go -> went to his brother – “Brothers, ->, etc. could also professor who teaches This language later, as the best foreign language is hard to beat as a child of six years you simply by making him or her to check, for example, for a list of thirty species of trees or thirty d ‘bird species, or if he knows the games and toys for children, playing with such a rule in his native language and likes to draw.
Thus, we can say with certainty that nature is the normal way of acquiring a language the best, simply the most effective and that all other methods lag miles behind him. Although there are many fun ways to learn a language are, they are not as effective as the easy way to purchase their first child. But there are certainly busy outrright methods that are dangerous and one of them is the training grammar.
Have you ever thought when purchasing or using the native language proper grammar until the age of six? Not really, to make most people whose parents are single style speakers of their parents, and vocabulary. The important thing is that we are certain areas in our brain are trained, a system of repetitive patterns, such as past or the plural “s distilled” as the path -> Manners fan – have> Fans can – canned and so on. This process is automatic and proper “grammar” of the rule is woven into the patterns of use and then work without thinking.
But if you do not force anyone, esp. Children, on the basis of these rules into account, worse still, to learn before you get the process of consolidation of the rule, so that your child may never learn the second language fluently, but can still behave as a self-aware – and slowly trying to destroy President, first access to its grammatical “rule book” which is now stored in a completely different part of the brain.
This has been known for decades, but the modern schools and teacher training currikcula does not reflect this knowledge. Instead, children are given tasks in their mother tongue and the challenge in the target language to which they lead are encouraged to apply these rules to play. This is part of a series of articles, where we also have damage that will force the children to translate for the top cover is between languages. Mention just a few sources to use grammar and its impact:
“Why is the correct grammar does not work? The first reason why the grammar information in writing class does not work, it develops only the surface appearance of grammar and not with the how language … Second, learn grammar in a second language deals with a complex and gradual process that occurs both developmentally and hierarchically (some items are copied from others). is exacerbated, that not occur, the learning of language elements in a linear fashion, the learning curve of an element of valleys and ridges, progress and shortcomings in their entirety. ”
(Grammar Correction in ESL / EFL Writing Classes will not be effective, Ronald Gray Beijing Language and Culture University (Beijing, China))
The author continues: “What is a L2 writing teacher to do? The fastest and most effective solution would be to simply stop writing teacher, grammar, such corrections. And take note: “In summary, teachers must be set aside to consider the formation of red feathers and their ideas and see what students are trying to say instead of just looking for grammatical errors.
“If you learn that to speak a new language, learning grammar is not only useless but harmful and develop your ability to speak fluently. … In most cases, our language is formed by communications, quantity and quality of literature review, education, or just our environment. At the same time the constant repetition you develop a sense of language and the ability to imitate the pronunciation of words and phrases. “(Native Method Bridge)
“Teachers and students are serious about correcting the face of overwhelming problems, and corrections in the effective application in the treatment of adverse side effects of this practice suggests. Research suggests the conclusion that oral correction does not improve the ability of learners No Speak grammatically. good reasons to maintain the practice has been put forward. For these reasons, language teachers should seriously consider not taking oral grammar correction altogether. “(John Truscott:” What’s Wrong with Oral Grammar correction “http: / / www.hss.nthu.edu.tw/ ~ / fl faculty / John / What ‘s Wrong with Oral Grammar Correction 1999.htm summarized here: The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 writing classes, Language Learning 46:2, June 1996, pp. 327-369
Posted in